Headlines

As reported by the Los Angeles Times, April 19, 2006.

Studies Ease Fears About Dental Amalgam

No Impairments Found in Children

By Thomas H. Maugh, II

The first clinical trials to study the safety of mercury amalgam dental fillings showed no mental or physical impairments in children carrying the fillings for as long as seven years, according to two studies published Wednesday in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

"If I were a parent or a dentist looking at these trials, I would have to conclude that we should stick with amalgam," said epidemiologist Sonja M. McKinlay of the New England Research Institutes, who led one of the trials.

The strength of the evidence is "particularly impressive," added Dr. Lawrence Tabak, director of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, which sponsored both trials. "The studies evaluated mercury exposure in two large, geographically distinct groups of children and reached similar conclusions about the safety of amalgam."

Critics, however, charged that the studies were not designed to detect problems that might manifest themselves in adulthood, as has been observed with some other metals, such as lead.

"The question of subtle effects remains open," wrote Dr. Herbert Needleman of the University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine in an editorial in the same journal.

Mercury amalgam is a silver-colored powder of silver, copper, zinc and other metals held together by mercury. It has been used to fill cavities for more than 150 years and an estimated 70 million fillings are installed each year in the United States.

Mercury amalgam fillings are the most commonly used filling because they are cheaper, easier to use and more durable. Resin composites are typically used for cosmetic reasons in front teeth, but are not as durable as amalgam and their long-term health effects are unknown.

Gold fillings, which do not contain mercury, are also used, but they are much more expensive and more difficult to install.

Mercury is toxic in sizable doses - such as those ingested when eating substantial quantities of mercury-contaminated fish, for example - and critics have charged that it must therefore produce damaging effects at lower doses as well.

Epidemiological studies over the years, however, have shown no link between dental fillings and neurological or other problems.

Two decades ago, the development of new, more sensitive instruments revealed that minute traces of mercury vapor escape from the fillings, sparking renewed concern about the potential health effects.

The current studies were begun in 1996 to address those concerns.

McKinlay and her colleagues studied 534 children at dental clinics in New England who previously had no fillings. Half were assigned to receive mercury amalgam fillings and the other half, white composite resin fillings like those typically used for cosmetic purposes on front teeth.

Epidemiologist Timothy A. DeRouen of the University of Washington and his colleagues studied 507 children in Lisbon, Portugal, using a similar protocol.

The New England children had an average of 15 fillings over the study period, while the Lisbon group had an average of 18.7 fillings in the amalgam group and 21.3 in the composite resin group.

The researchers found no changes in IQ, memory, attention, visual functioning or nerve signaling during the study.

"During the period when the children are growing and developing, we didn't see any effect," DeRouen said. "This is the only objective evidence we have at this point."

The studies also found no changes to the kidney, which has been shown to be sensitive to damage from higher levels of mercury.

"This adds to a growing body of opinion that dental amalgam is a safe and effective material," said Dr. J. Robert Kelly of the University of Connecticut, speaking for the American Dental Association.